Kuroma Kuroma

www.narita-airport.jp scores 40/100 for AI Readiness

NARITA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (www.narita-airport.jp) is a Airlines / Aviation site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 40/100 (grade D), audited 16 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (75) and its weakest is AI Readiness (26); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it above the median of the 227 Transportation sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://www.narita-airport.jp

40/100
Grade
D

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 7.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 44 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 44 days ago

Above the median in Transportation Median 39 · Top quartile 43 · across 227 audited sites in Transportation

Is www.narita-airport.jp ready for AI search?

Not yet: www.narita-airport.jp scores 40/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 33
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 75
Authority Signals 25% of the score 37
AI Readiness 30% of the score 26

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://www.narita-airport.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://www.narita-airport.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  3. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6.1 pts

    On https://www.narita-airport.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 13/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://www.narita-airport.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +5.1 pts

    On https://www.narita-airport.jp · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 56/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 165 words, 10 paragraphs, 4 lists, 7 images (2 with alt text)

    • Content length (165 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 5 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 3 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 69/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 3. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 33/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 5 of 7 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 4 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 7 images but only ~165 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 13/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 4/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    7 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 59/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (2 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Social profiles (5)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 47/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    0 of 12 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 15 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 59/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 59/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Partial 70/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    165 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Airlines / Aviation sites