Kuroma
AI Discoverability
What this check reads on your page
Five landmark elements are counted, article, section, aside, nav and main: which of them the page uses, how many of them it uses in total, and whether a main element or role=main marks the content region. The check then reads the visible text for a copyright notice, ©, 'all rights reserved' or 版權所有, and for a licensing statement such as Creative Commons, 'licensed under' or 授權條款. A link to llms.txt is detected and reported but scores nothing, because no major engine reads it.
Our verdict on the evidence
Rescoped to the evidence Rescoped to on-page machine-readability signals (semantic HTML, licensing clarity). The dead ai-plugin manifest check was removed and llms.txt stays informational only, because no major engine reads it.
Vercel and MERJ AI crawler study (569M GPTBot requests: zero JavaScript execution, no image fetches) · Google Search Central guidance on AI features (no special schema needed, no ideal page length)
This score reads tags, not layout, so a page whose main content sits in a plain div scores low here even when a human finds it in a second; the parsers that chunk on landmarks lose the same page the same way. It cannot tell you what an engine will do with a licence, only whether one is stated in words a parser can find. Nothing on this page needs a new file or a new service: every point is a tag already in the template, or a sentence in the footer.
What it is worth
10% of AI Readiness, which is 3 points of the overall 100.
How audited pages score on it
Based on 30,738 audited pages.
The median page scores 59, and the middle half of pages score between 43 and 70.
- Good (75 to 100)4,189 (14%)
- Moderate (50 to 74)16,122 (52%)
- Needs work (25 to 49)7,416 (24%)
- Critical (0 to 24)3,011 (10%)
34% of audited pages score below 50 on it.
Where it fails most and least
Industries that fail it most
- Gaming: 45% of 817 audited pages fail it
- Government / GovTech: 45% of 141 audited pages fail it
- Publishing / News Media: 43% of 905 audited pages fail it
- Wealth Management / Investment: 43% of 214 audited pages fail it
- Banking / Neo-banking: 42% of 363 audited pages fail it
Industries that fail it least
- AI / Machine Learning: 17% of 477 audited pages fail it
- Digital Health / Health Tech: 20% of 128 audited pages fail it
- AdTech / Advertising: 20% of 138 audited pages fail it
- Mental Health / Wellness: 21% of 117 audited pages fail it
- Cybersecurity: 23% of 108 audited pages fail it
How to fix it
- Wrap the content in a main element and each self-contained piece in an article, with section elements for its parts.
- Use nav and aside for the menu and the sidebar, so a parser can tell them from the content.
- State the copyright in the footer, and if you permit reuse, say under which licence.