AI Readiness benchmark for Cybersecurity

Across 108 audited domains we have classified as Cybersecurity, the median AI Readiness score is 48 out of 100. That is 9 points above the median for all 30,738 audited domains in the corpus (39).

How the scores are distributed

Lower quartile39a quarter of the 108 score below this
Median48the midpoint of the 108
Upper quartile54a quarter score above this
050100

Half of the 108 audited Cybersecurity domains score between 39 and 54. The corpus-wide interquartile range, across all 30,738 audited domains, is 32 to 45.

Which factors this industry fails most often

The rubric scores 19 factors. A factor counts as failed here when a site scores below 50 out of 100 on it. The last column is how many audits each rate was calculated from. Question Coverage & FAQ Presence and Media Accessibility are not scored on every kind of page: a rankings table or a paginated index has no question to answer and no image to caption. Citation-Worthiness, Question Coverage & FAQ Presence and E-E-A-T Signals lean on English-language patterns, so on a page written in another language they are scored out of a smaller total. Those rows therefore leave out every audit of a page the factor was not scored on the same scale, and every audit that did not record enough about the page for us to tell. Every other row counts every audit in this industry that scored the factor.

Factor Fails in Cybersecurity Fails corpus-wide Difference Audits counted
Structured Data Quality
On-Page Content · 4.5% of the total score
97% 96% +1 108
Unique Value Proposition
AI Readiness · 5.1% of the total score
95% 94% +1 108
Citation-Worthiness
AI Readiness · 7.5% of the total score · counted only on pages in a language it measures in full
87% 94% -7 69
Question Coverage & FAQ Presence
On-Page Content · 6.5% of the total score · counted only on pages this factor applies to, in a language it measures in full
80% 85% -5 66
Media Accessibility
On-Page Content · 1.8% of the total score · counted only on pages this factor applies to
78% 87% -9 102
E-E-A-T Signals
Authority Signals · 7% of the total score · counted only on pages in a language it measures in full
67% 89% -22 69
Content Freshness
AI Readiness · 5.7% of the total score
57% 49% +8 108
External Citations & References
Authority Signals · 9% of the total score
56% 83% -27 108
Answer Box Potential
AI Readiness · 7.2% of the total score
49% 68% -19 108
Crawlability & Accessibility
Technical Optimization · 13% of the total score
40% 46% -6 108
Trust & Brand Signals
Authority Signals · 9% of the total score
38% 74% -36 108
Schema Markup Completeness
Technical Optimization · 1% of the total score
38% 63% -25 108
AI Discoverability
AI Readiness · 3% of the total score
23% 34% -11 108
Raw HTML Availability
AI Readiness · 1.5% of the total score
21% 24% -3 108
Page Performance Indicators
Technical Optimization · 2% of the total score
16% 20% -4 108
Content Depth & Comprehensiveness
On-Page Content · 6.5% of the total score
12% 14% -2 108
Heading Hierarchy
On-Page Content · 2.8% of the total score
8% 28% -20 108
Mobile Optimization
Technical Optimization · 4% of the total score
3% 14% -11 108
AI Readability Score
On-Page Content · 3% of the total score
3% 8% -5 106

Where Cybersecurity diverges from everyone else

Relative to the whole corpus, this industry is distinctively weak on Content Freshness (+8 points), Structured Data Quality (+1 points), Unique Value Proposition (+1 points).

It is distinctively strong on Trust & Brand Signals (-36 points), External Citations & References (-27 points), Schema Markup Completeness (-25 points).

Content Freshness: fails on 57% of the 108 Cybersecurity audits it was measured on

Freshness is the only unanimous causal gatekeeper across engines in the 2026 evidence base, and AI-cited content skews measurably fresher at web scale. Google AI Overviews is the documented exception.

Structured Data Quality: fails on 97% of the 108 Cybersecurity audits it was measured on

Rescoped to extractable data structures in the HTML itself (tables and lists), which measurably improve machine extraction. This is distinct from schema.org markup, which shows no AI-citation lift in controlled tests.

Unique Value Proposition: fails on 95% of the 108 Cybersecurity audits it was measured on

Unique-wording signals test near null; the real phenomenon is competitive redundancy, which a single-page crawl cannot measure deterministically. Weight halved accordingly.

Audited Cybersecurity sites with a public report card

Each of these sites has a public AI Readiness report card from a real audit. Scores are point-in-time; the card shows what was measured and when.

Site Grade Score Audited
quickheal.co.in Grade A 72/100 20 Aug 2026
TracePass (tracepass.eu) Grade A 71/100 20 Aug 2026
Stop Downtime & Business Disruption (absolute.com) Grade A 68/100 20 Aug 2026
malwarebytes.com Grade A 66/100 20 Aug 2026
group-ib.com Grade A 65/100 20 Aug 2026
趨勢科技 (TW) (trendmicro.com) Grade A 65/100 20 Aug 2026
purple.ai Grade A 64/100 20 Aug 2026
サイバートラスト (cybertrust.co.jp) Grade B 52/100 15 Sep 2026
HENNGE Taiwan 台灣惠頂益 (hennge.com) Grade B 51/100 15 Sep 2026
www.alsi.co.jp Grade C 47/100 16 Sep 2026
ディー (dds.co.jp) Grade C 47/100 15 Sep 2026
投稿監視からデバッグ (e-guardian.co.jp) Grade C 46/100 16 Sep 2026

Browse every audited site in the public audit archive.

See the full ranked list of 17 Cybersecurity sites →

How to read this

Audit your own site →

Other industry benchmarks

Manufacturing / Industrial Food & Beverage / CPG Travel / Hospitality Consulting / Professional Services Automotive / Mobility DTC / Consumer Brands Publishing / News Media Gaming Streaming / Video Pharma / Biotech Restaurant Tech AI / Machine Learning

All industry benchmarks