Kuroma Kuroma

malwarebytes.com scores 66/100 for AI Readiness

malwarebytes.com is a Cybersecurity site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 66/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (79) and its weakest is AI Readiness (62); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 13/100 (2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization, Product). That places it in the top quartile of the 112 Cybersecurity sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://malwarebytes.com

66/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Cybersecurity Median 47.5 · Top quartile 54 · across 112 audited sites in Cybersecurity

Is malwarebytes.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: malwarebytes.com scores 66/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 63
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 79
Authority Signals 25% of the score 65
AI Readiness 30% of the score 62

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.3 pts

    On https://malwarebytes.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 16/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.9 pts

    On https://malwarebytes.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 13/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +3.8 pts

    On https://malwarebytes.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 58/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  4. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts

    On https://malwarebytes.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  5. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +3.3 pts

    On https://malwarebytes.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 49/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 84/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1542 words, 112 paragraphs, 28 lists, 34 images (26 with alt text)

    • 8 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 49/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 3 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 13/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization, Product

  • AI Readability Score Pass 99/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 10 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 95/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 7, H3: 15. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Partial 53/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 8 of 34 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 5 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Twitter icon", "Icon facebook", "Icon Linkedin").
    • 22 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 34 images but only ~1542 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    19 render-blocking resources. 1336 elements for 1542 words

    • 19 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 15 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 80/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 12 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 12 of 140 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 65/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 13/25. Authority: 22/25. Trust: 20/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 58/100

    9% of the overall score

    11 external links, 0 citation phrases, 2 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 71/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (6 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Testimonials, Social profiles (5)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 69/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    18 of 29 headings open a quotable passage, 3 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    1 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Pass 95/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/19/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 16/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    2 of 99 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 71/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 71/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1542 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Cybersecurity · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai