Kuroma Kuroma

purple.ai scores 64/100 for AI Readiness

Guest, Staff & Multi-Tenant WiFi Platform (purple.ai) is a Cybersecurity site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 64/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (90) and its weakest is AI Readiness (37); the biggest single gap is Content Freshness at 0/100 (No recent year references in content). That places it in the top quartile of the 3099 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://purple.ai

64/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3099 audited sites in Technology

Is purple.ai ready for AI search?

Largely yes: purple.ai scores 64/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 73
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 90
Authority Signals 25% of the score 66
AI Readiness 30% of the score 37

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6.6 pts

    On https://purple.ai · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 12/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts

    On https://purple.ai · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  3. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4 pts

    On https://purple.ai · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 43/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4 pts

    On https://purple.ai · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 22/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.8 pts

    On https://purple.ai · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 16/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3011 words, 59 paragraphs, 4 lists, 172 images (44 with alt text)

    • 128 images missing alt text (e.g. /images/Purple-Icons-01.svg, /images/Purple-Icons-03.svg, /images/Purple-Icons-04.svg)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 91/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 11 question headings. 3 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 16/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    4 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, WebPage, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Pass 82/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 3 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 6, H3: 14. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 25/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 128 of 172 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 25 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Purple Logo", "Purple", "AGS").
    • 22 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 172 images but only ~3011 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    4 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 78/100

    2% of the overall score

    7 render-blocking resources. 1586 elements for 3011 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 83/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 56 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 93/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 2 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 43/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 65/100

    9% of the overall score

    5 external links, 0 citation phrases, 4 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 84/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Testimonials, Social profiles (2)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 76/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    12 of 21 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 12/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 22/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    4 of 160 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 72/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 72/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3011 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Cybersecurity · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai