Kuroma Kuroma

quickheal.co.in scores 72/100 for AI Readiness

quickheal.co.in is a Cybersecurity site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 72/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (78) and its weakest is AI Readiness (68); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 22/100 (5 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, BreadcrumbList, Organization, FAQPage, AboutPage). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,298 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://quickheal.co.in

72/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 30/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 5.3 points off the overall score.

This audit is 45 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 45 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,298 audited sites in Technology

Is quickheal.co.in ready for AI search?

Largely yes: quickheal.co.in scores 72/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 78
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 69
Authority Signals 25% of the score 73
AI Readiness 30% of the score 68

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.3 pts

    On https://quickheal.co.in · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 30/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +3.6 pts

    On https://quickheal.co.in · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 72/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 21 of 176 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 65 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.5 pts

    On https://quickheal.co.in · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 22/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +2.8 pts

    On https://quickheal.co.in · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 60/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +2.7 pts

    On https://quickheal.co.in · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 70/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2059 words, 82 paragraphs, 23 lists, 74 images (60 with alt text)

    • 14 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 96/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 4 question headings. 10 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 22/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    5 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, BreadcrumbList, Organization, FAQPage, AboutPage

  • AI Readability Score Pass 95/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 80/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 10, H3: 22. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 14 of 74 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 7 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("logo", "Image 1", "Image 2") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 23 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("AntiFraud.AI", "Linkdin", "Twitter").
    • 41 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    5 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 53/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (10664ms). 9 render-blocking resources. 1453 elements for 2059 words

    • Server response was slow (10664ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 72/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 21 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 21 of 176 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 60/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 20/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    20 external links, 0 citation phrases, 30 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 86/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Testimonials, Social profiles (5)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 74/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    15 of 42 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 30/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 79/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/6/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Pass 84/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    28 of 153 passages carry a figure, 22 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 83/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 83/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2059 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Cybersecurity sites

Other Cybersecurity sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.