Kuroma Kuroma

group-ib.com scores 65/100 for AI Readiness

group-ib.com is a Cybersecurity site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 65/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (80) and its weakest is AI Readiness (54); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,298 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://group-ib.com

65/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Question Coverage & FAQ Presence: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 6.5% of the total, which takes 6.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 45 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 45 days ago

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,298 audited sites in Technology

Is group-ib.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: group-ib.com scores 65/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 59
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 80
Authority Signals 25% of the score 72
AI Readiness 30% of the score 54

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://group-ib.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.1 pts

    On https://group-ib.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 32/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.4 pts

    On https://group-ib.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 13/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.3 pts

    On https://group-ib.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 53/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +2.5 pts

    On https://group-ib.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 45/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 96/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1682 words, 53 paragraphs, 37 lists, 64 images (52 with alt text)

    • 12 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 45/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Article, WebPage, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization, Person

  • AI Readability Score Pass 94/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 3 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 12, H3: 3. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 56/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 12 of 64 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 4 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Integrations", "Search Icon", "Threat Intelligence").
    • 52 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 64 images but only ~1682 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 43/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (6351ms). 12 render-blocking resources. 1461 elements for 1682 words

    • Server response was slow (6351ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
    • 12 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 18 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 85/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 23 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 23 of 284 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 53/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 16/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Pass 75/100

    9% of the overall score

    7 external links, 1 citation phrases, 3 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 85/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (6 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 65/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    8 of 16 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 32/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    1 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Pass 92/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 7/21/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 13/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    1 of 106 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 56/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 56/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1682 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Cybersecurity sites

Other Cybersecurity sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.