Kuroma Kuroma

trendmicro.com 的 AI Readiness 實測 65/100

趨勢科技 (TW) (trendmicro.com) 是 Cybersecurity 類網站；Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 65/100（A 級），檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 20 日。 表現最強的是技術（73 分），最弱的是AI 就緒度（59 分）；最大的單一缺口是 Unique Value Proposition，20/100（5 of 154 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 3099 個 Technology 類網站 中，這個分數排在前四分之一。

Audited URL: https://trendmicro.com

65/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3099 audited sites in Technology

trendmicro.com 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？

大致準備好了：trendmicro.com 的實測分數為 65/100（A 級）。 剩下要補的是 Improve Unique Value Proposition、Make Media Machine-Readable to AI。

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 63
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 73
Authority Signals 25% of the score 69
AI Readiness 30% of the score 59

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.1 pts

    On https://trendmicro.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 20/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  2. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +3.9 pts

    On https://trendmicro.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 40/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  3. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.6 pts

    On https://trendmicro.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 49/100

    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  4. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +3.3 pts

    On https://trendmicro.com · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 54/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • 12 of your 38 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +2.9 pts

    On https://trendmicro.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 36/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2088 words, 140 paragraphs, 46 lists, 1 tables, 34 images (22 with alt text)

    • 12 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 40/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 36/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 90/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 3, H2: 3, H3: 14. Proper hierarchy.

    • Multiple H1 headings (3) - should have exactly one
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 31/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 12 of 34 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 17 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("TrendAI", "Dell", "Ricoh").
    • 17 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • 3 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Partial 60/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 43/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3307ms). 14 render-blocking resources. 1724 elements for 2088 words

    • Server response was slow (3307ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
    • 14 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 8 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 80/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 9 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 9 of 142 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 49/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 21/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 14/25. Has author

  • External Citations & References Pass 80/100

    9% of the overall score

    19 external links, 1 citation phrases, 8 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 73/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (2 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 54/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    12 of 38 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 1 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 64/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 4 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 79/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 7/23/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 20/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    5 of 154 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 62/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 62/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2088 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Cybersecurity · Run a free AI Readiness audit

這是你經營的網站？ 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單 · 申請移除這張成績單

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai