Kuroma
AI Readiness benchmark for Streaming / Video
Across 756 audited domains we have classified as Streaming / Video, the median AI Readiness score is 37 out of 100. That is 2 points below the median for all 30,738 audited domains in the corpus (39).
How the scores are distributed
Half of the 756 audited Streaming / Video domains score between 29 and 42. The corpus-wide interquartile range, across all 30,738 audited domains, is 32 to 45.
Which factors this industry fails most often
The rubric scores 19 factors. A factor counts as failed here when a site scores below 50 out of 100 on it. The last column is how many audits each rate was calculated from. Question Coverage & FAQ Presence and Media Accessibility are not scored on every kind of page: a rankings table or a paginated index has no question to answer and no image to caption. Citation-Worthiness, E-E-A-T Signals and Question Coverage & FAQ Presence lean on English-language patterns, so on a page written in another language they are scored out of a smaller total. Those rows therefore leave out every audit of a page the factor was not scored on the same scale, and every audit that did not record enough about the page for us to tell. Every other row counts every audit in this industry that scored the factor.
| Factor | Fails in Streaming / Video | Fails corpus-wide | Difference | Audits counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation-Worthiness AI Readiness · 7.5% of the total score · counted only on pages in a language it measures in full |
98% | 94% | +4 | 135 |
| Unique Value Proposition AI Readiness · 5.1% of the total score |
97% | 94% | +3 | 756 |
| E-E-A-T Signals Authority Signals · 7% of the total score · counted only on pages in a language it measures in full |
96% | 89% | +7 | 135 |
| Structured Data Quality On-Page Content · 4.5% of the total score |
96% | 96% | 0 | 756 |
| External Citations & References Authority Signals · 9% of the total score |
91% | 83% | +8 | 756 |
| Trust & Brand Signals Authority Signals · 9% of the total score |
88% | 74% | +14 | 756 |
| Question Coverage & FAQ Presence On-Page Content · 6.5% of the total score · counted only on pages this factor applies to, in a language it measures in full |
88% | 85% | +3 | 123 |
| Media Accessibility On-Page Content · 1.8% of the total score · counted only on pages this factor applies to |
86% | 87% | -1 | 671 |
| Answer Box Potential AI Readiness · 7.2% of the total score |
79% | 68% | +11 | 756 |
| Schema Markup Completeness Technical Optimization · 1% of the total score |
74% | 63% | +11 | 756 |
| Crawlability & Accessibility Technical Optimization · 13% of the total score |
54% | 46% | +8 | 756 |
| Content Freshness AI Readiness · 5.7% of the total score |
48% | 49% | -1 | 756 |
| AI Discoverability AI Readiness · 3% of the total score |
38% | 34% | +4 | 756 |
| Heading Hierarchy On-Page Content · 2.8% of the total score |
37% | 28% | +9 | 756 |
| Raw HTML Availability AI Readiness · 1.5% of the total score |
33% | 24% | +9 | 756 |
| Content Depth & Comprehensiveness On-Page Content · 6.5% of the total score |
24% | 14% | +10 | 756 |
| Page Performance Indicators Technical Optimization · 2% of the total score |
22% | 20% | +2 | 756 |
| Mobile Optimization Technical Optimization · 4% of the total score |
15% | 14% | +1 | 756 |
| AI Readability Score On-Page Content · 3% of the total score |
14% | 8% | +6 | 714 |
Where Streaming / Video diverges from everyone else
Relative to the whole corpus, this industry is distinctively weak on Trust & Brand Signals (+14 points), Answer Box Potential (+11 points), Schema Markup Completeness (+11 points).
It is distinctively strong on Media Accessibility (-1 points), Content Freshness (-1 points).
Trust & Brand Signals: fails on 88% of the 756 Streaming / Video audits it was measured on
On-page trust badges are untested as a class; the evidenced trust channel is off-site reviews. Retained for publisher accountability (who publishes this, declared where a machine can read it) and for basic legitimacy signals such as contact routes and published policies.
Answer Box Potential: fails on 79% of the 756 Streaming / Video audits it was measured on
The real mechanism is passage self-containment: heading-scoped sections that stand alone match retrieval chunking, and fixing context-severed passages measurably cuts retrieval failures.
Schema Markup Completeness: fails on 74% of the 756 Streaming / Video audits it was measured on
Controlled tests show no AI-citation lift from schema.org markup, and Google states no special structured data is needed for AI features. Near-zero weight is kept only for classic rich results and Bing grounding.
Audited Streaming / Video sites with a public report card
Each of these sites has a public AI Readiness report card from a real audit. Scores are point-in-time; the card shows what was measured and when.
| Site | Grade | Score | Audited |
|---|---|---|---|
| 海外FXおすすめ比較ランキング18選【2026年8月最新】評判から人気の海外口座を紹介 (grassvalley.jp) | Grade A | 67/100 | 20 Aug 2026 |
| HBO Max (hbogoasia.tw) | Grade A | 64/100 | 20 Aug 2026 |
| HBO Max (max.com) | Grade A | 64/100 | 20 Aug 2026 |
| 観たい映画はこの街で 横浜シネマリン (cinemarine.co.jp) | Grade A | 61/100 | 15 Sep 2026 |
| BS12 (twellv.co.jp) | Grade A | 60/100 | 15 Sep 2026 |
| TuneCore Japan (tunecore.co.jp) | Grade A | 59/100 | 15 Sep 2026 |
| テレビ東京メディアネット Media Next メディアは次のステージへ TV TOKYO MEDIANET (medianet.co.jp) | Grade A | 58/100 | 15 Sep 2026 |
| 【公式】カンテレSHOPPING (ktvolm.jp) | Grade B | 57/100 | 15 Sep 2026 |
| タワーレコードオンライン (tower.jp) | Grade B | 56/100 | 15 Sep 2026 |
| 素敵な年下男子に会える！ママ活アプリ安全に使うためのポイント (wonderpro.jp) | Grade B | 55/100 | 15 Sep 2026 |
| 株式会社極東電視台 (far-eastern.co.jp) | Grade B | 54/100 | 15 Sep 2026 |
| Ｊストリーム (www.stream.co.jp) | Grade B | 53/100 | 16 Sep 2026 |
Browse every audited site in the public audit archive.
See the full ranked list of 50 Streaming / Video sites →
How to read this
- What the sample is. The 756 domains we have audited and classified as Streaming / Video. That is a sample of the industry, not a census: it is the set of sites our crawler has reached and scored, and it carries whatever bias that selection has.
- Rubric version 2026-08-13. Every figure here comes from audits scored on this single rubric generation. Scores from different generations measure different things, so they are never mixed. Compatible generations: 2026-08-13.
- Why there are no company names. These are aggregates. We do not publish which domains sit at the bottom of a distribution, and the queries behind this page cannot return a domain name.
- Publishing floor. We publish an industry only once it reaches 100 audited domains, and a factor's failure rate only once 30 audits in the industry count toward that factor. Below either floor the number would move with a handful of sites, so we withhold it.
- What the audit can and cannot see. This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. Read the full methodology.