Kuroma
woodpeckertek.com scores 38/100 for AI Readiness
啄木科技 Woodpecker Technology (woodpeckertek.com) scores 38/100 (grade D) on AI Readiness, audited 23 Jul 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (76) and its weakest is Authority Signals (24); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected).
Audited URL: https://woodpeckertek.com
This audit is 55 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Is woodpeckertek.com ready for AI search?
Not yet: woodpeckertek.com scores 38/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Implement Comprehensive Schema Markup.
Category scores
This audit did not record which rubric version scored it, so it is not confirmed as the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content
-
Found: 627 words, 28 paragraphs, 2 lists, 19 images (0 with alt text)
- Content length (627 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
- 19 images missing alt text (e.g. /src/assets/images/common/headerLogo-en.svg, /src/assets/images/product/intro/bg-vector.png, /src/assets/images/product/intro/XVRLogo.svg)
-
No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
No JSON-LD structured data found
- No JSON-LD structured data found
-
Average 14 words/sentence. 6 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
H1: 1, H2: 5, H3: 12. Proper hierarchy.
-
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 19 of 19 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 19 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- This page has 19 images but only ~627 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
Technical Optimization
-
0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph
-
Fetch succeeded with an acceptable response time
-
Has viewport
-
HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable
- Missing canonical tag
Authority Signals
-
Experience: 0/25. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 10/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
0 external links, 0 citation phrases, 3 statistics. No references section.
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
-
Present: SSL, Privacy Policy
- No contact information easily accessible
AI Readiness
-
0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 tables
- No FAQ structure detected
-
0 original data indicators, 3 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
No recent year references
- No recent year references in content
- No article publish/modified dates in metadata
-
3 unique value phrases, 0 differentiators, 1 case study mentions.
-
Score: 60/100
-
627 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this card