Kuroma Kuroma

datenna.com scores 43/100 for AI Readiness

Datenna (datenna.com) scores 43/100 (grade C) on AI Readiness, audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (65) and its weakest is AI Readiness (29); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected).

Audited URL: https://Datenna.com

43/100
Grade
C

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is datenna.com ready for AI search?

Partly: datenna.com scores 43/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 35
Technical Optimization 65
Authority Signals 51
AI Readiness 29

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Found: 1044 words, 29 paragraphs, 7 images (3 with alt text)

    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
    • 4 images missing alt text (e.g. /images/insa_pressrelease.jpg, /images/intel_report_chinas_biggest_meeting_2026.jpg, /images/scsp_expo_may_2026.png)
  • No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • 1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    Average 10 words/sentence. 4 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 80/100

    H1: 2, H2: 7, H3: 13. Proper hierarchy.

    • Multiple H1 headings (2) - should have exactly one
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 31/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 4 of 7 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 3 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Datenna", "Datenna", "Datenna").
    • 4 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 42/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 4/10. Trust: 17/25

    • No author attribution found
  • 1 external links, 0 citation phrases, 7 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 75/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Contact, Testimonials, Social Links

AI Readiness

  • 0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 42/100

    1 original data indicators, 5 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • 0 of 86 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 78/100

    Score: 78/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1044 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site →