Kuroma Kuroma

airai.tw scores 57/100 for AI Readiness

AIRAI Technology (airai.tw) is a Enterprise Software / AI Automation site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 57/100 (grade B), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (66) and its weakest is Authority Signals (46); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 2 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://airai.tw

57/100
Grade
B

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 41/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 7.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 26 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 26 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is airai.tw ready for AI search?

Mostly, with gaps: airai.tw scores 57/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add External Citations & References.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 66
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 57
Authority Signals 25% of the score 46
AI Readiness 30% of the score 57

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7.7 pts

    On https://airai.tw · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 41/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 1 of 27 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at airai.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 9 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +7.2 pts

    On https://airai.tw · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 20/100

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
    • Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://airai.tw · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 2 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  4. Update Content Freshness up to +4 pts

    On https://airai.tw · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 30/100

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  5. Add Trust Signals up to +3.7 pts

    On https://airai.tw · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 59/100

    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 77/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1185 words, 53 paragraphs, 3 lists, 2 images (2 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 88/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 8 question headings. 3 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, FAQPage

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 2 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 80/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 5, H3: 18. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Pass 80/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 65/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3694ms). 3 render-blocking resources. 647 elements for 1185 words

    • Server response was slow (3694ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 93/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 2 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 1 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 1 of 27 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at airai.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 61/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 24/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 10/25. Has author

    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Fail 20/100

    9% of the overall score

    0 external links, 0 citation phrases, 19 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 59/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Privacy Policy

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 67/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    21 of 39 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 58/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 19 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 45/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    9 of 100 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 3 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 78/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 78/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1185 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card