Kuroma Kuroma

beauty-diagram.com scores 54/100 for AI Readiness

Beauty Diagram (beauty-diagram.com) scores 54/100 (grade B) on AI Readiness, audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (84) and its weakest is Authority Signals (30); the biggest single gap is E-E-A-T Signals at 18/100 (No author attribution found).

Audited URL: https://beauty-diagram.com

54/100
Grade
B

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is beauty-diagram.com ready for AI search?

Mostly, with gaps: beauty-diagram.com scores 54/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 84
Technical Optimization 50
Authority Signals 30
AI Readiness 53

The 17 checks scored on this page

Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 2 more checks were not scored on this page and are listed below with no score.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 94/100

    Found: 1093 words, 12 paragraphs, 3 lists, 1 tables, 8 images (8 with alt text)

  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    FAQ schema present. 1 question headings. 6 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Partial 60/100

    5 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: FAQPage, WebSite, Organization, SoftwareApplication, ItemList

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    Average 9 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    H1: 1, H2: 6, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 6 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    5 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 65/100

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (4199ms). 3 render-blocking resources. 717 elements for 1093 words

    • Server response was slow (4199ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 3 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 3 of 42 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at beauty-diagram.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 18/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    1 external links, 0 citation phrases, 7 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 35/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Contact

AI Readiness

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card