Kuroma Kuroma

onoden.co.jp scores 46/100 for AI Readiness

onoden.co.jp is a retail site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 46/100 (grade C), audited 16 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (59) and its weakest is Authority Signals (39); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it in the top quartile of the 2,008 E-commerce & Retail sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://onoden.co.jp

46/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in Question Coverage & FAQ Presence: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 6.5% of the total, which takes 6.5 points off the overall score.

Updated today

Top 25% in E-commerce & Retail Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 2,008 audited sites in E-commerce & Retail

Is onoden.co.jp ready for AI search?

Partly: onoden.co.jp scores 46/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 46
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 59
Authority Signals 25% of the score 39
AI Readiness 30% of the score 42

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://onoden.co.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6.4 pts

    On https://onoden.co.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 9/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.3 pts

    On https://onoden.co.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 30/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +5.1 pts

    On https://onoden.co.jp · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 61/100

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 14 of 252 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Add canonical tag to prevent duplicate content issues
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Add a robots.txt file to guide AI crawlers and search engines
  5. Add Trust Signals up to +4.8 pts

    On https://onoden.co.jp · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 47/100

    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 87/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1,044 words, 62 paragraphs, 23 lists, 36 images (31 with alt text)

    • 5 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 20/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 6 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 53/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 5, H3: 32. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Partial 52/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 5 of 36 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 3 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("altaclasse", "altaclasse", "Hinomoto Aloha").
    • 31 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 36 images but only ~1,044 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Fail 20/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    13 render-blocking resources. 889 elements for 1,044 words

    • 13 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 61/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. No robots.txt, so nothing blocks AI crawlers. 14 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 14 of 252 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 9/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    6 external links, 0 citation phrases, 24 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 47/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (3)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 49/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    1 of 37 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 30/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Partial 62/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 9/14/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 15/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 94 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 13 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 80/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 80/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited retail sites

Other retail sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.