Kuroma
mk-chou.com scores 27/100 for AI Readiness
MK Chou (mk-chou.com) scores 27/100 (grade F) on AI Readiness, audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (38) and its weakest is AI Readiness (15); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected).
Audited URL: https://mk-chou.com
This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Is mk-chou.com ready for AI search?
Not yet: mk-chou.com scores 27/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.
Category scores
This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content
-
Found: 138 words, 7 paragraphs, 2 lists, 2 images (1 with alt text)
- Content length (138 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
- 1 images missing alt text (e.g. )
-
No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
No JSON-LD structured data found
- No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the one list or table this check found sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
-
Average 19 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. No text formatting.
- 2 sentences exceed 25 words
-
H1: 1, H2: 0, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.
- Insufficient section headings to break the content up
-
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 1 of 2 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 1 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
Technical Optimization
-
0 valid schemas
-
4 render-blocking resources. 89 elements for 138 words
-
Has viewport
-
HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. No robots.txt, so nothing blocks AI crawlers. 5 placeholder links
- Missing canonical tag
- 5 of 13 links cannot be followed by a crawler
Authority Signals
-
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 0/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
5 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.
-
Present: SSL, Contact, Social Links
- No privacy policy link found
AI Readiness
-
0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures
- No FAQ structure detected
-
0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
No recent year references
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
0 of 6 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
-
Score: 63/100
-
138 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this card