Kuroma
ethereum-magicians.org scores 29/100 for AI Readiness
Fellowship of Ethereum Magicians (ethereum-magicians.org) scores 29/100 (grade F) on AI Readiness, audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (54) and its weakest is Authority Signals (15); the biggest single gap is Content Freshness at 0/100 (No recent year references in content).
Audited URL: https://ethereum-magicians.org
This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Is ethereum-magicians.org ready for AI search?
Not yet: ethereum-magicians.org scores 29/100 (grade F). Start with Expand Content Depth & Comprehensiveness and Update Content Freshness.
Category scores
This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.
The 17 checks scored on this page
Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 2 more checks were not scored on this page and are listed below with no score.
On-Page Content
-
Found: 197 words, 2 paragraphs, 1 lists, 1 tables
- Content length (197 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
- Limited use of lists for scannable content
-
Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Not applicable
Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category
No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite
-
Average 15 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
H1: 0, H2: 0, H3: 9. Hierarchy issues.
- Missing H1 heading
-
Media Accessibility Not applicable
Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category
Not scored on this page: data/listing page with no substantive media
Technical Optimization
-
1 valid schemas, has OpenGraph
-
29 render-blocking resources. 193 elements for 197 words
- 29 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
-
Has viewport. has theme-color
-
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 2 placeholder links
- 2 of 17 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- The response at ethereum-magicians.org is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
Authority Signals
-
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 7/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
1 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
-
Present: SSL, Privacy Policy
- No contact information easily accessible
AI Readiness
-
1 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 1 comparison structures
- No FAQ structure detected
-
0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
- Hedged language is frequent (8 hedge words per 100 sentences), which weakens citation-worthiness
-
No recent year references
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
0 of 9 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
-
Score: 18/100
-
197 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this card