Kuroma Kuroma

aitextcleaner.pro scores 67/100 for AI Readiness

AI Text Cleaner (aitextcleaner.pro) scores 67/100 (grade A) on AI Readiness, audited 27 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (77) and its weakest is Authority Signals (56); the biggest single gap is Raw HTML Availability at 10/100 (This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://aitextcleaner.pro

67/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in E-E-A-T Signals: it scored 34/100 on a check worth 7% of the total, which takes 4.6 points off the overall score.

This audit is 19 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 19 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is aitextcleaner.pro ready for AI search?

Largely yes: aitextcleaner.pro scores 67/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Improve Raw HTML Availability and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 77
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 74
Authority Signals 25% of the score 56
AI Readiness 30% of the score 64

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.6 pts

    On https://aitextcleaner.pro · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 34/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://aitextcleaner.pro · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +3.8 pts

    On https://aitextcleaner.pro · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 71/100

    • 14 of 89 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: Meta-ExternalAgent, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.
    • This page opens 24 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  4. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +3.8 pts

    On https://aitextcleaner.pro · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 50/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3 pts

    On https://aitextcleaner.pro · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 33/100

    • Add a caption to each table so an engine knows what the table is of

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • 6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1789 words, 85 paragraphs, 4 lists, 1 tables, 38 images (34 with alt text)

    • 4 images missing alt text (e.g. /images/blog/clean-ai-text-without-changing-meaning.webp, /images/blog/what-an-ai-text-cleaner-actually-strips.webp, /images/blog/hidden-characters-in-model-paste.webp)
  • 6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 6 question headings. 2 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 33/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: FAQPage, Organization, WebSite, WebPage, SoftwareApplication

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 5 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 91/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 14, H3: 24. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 43/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 4 of 38 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 21 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Visa", "Mastercard", "American Express").
    • 9 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 38 images but only ~1789 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • 1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • 2% of the overall score

    5 render-blocking resources. 795 elements for 1789 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 68/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • 13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 14 placeholder links

    • 14 of 89 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: Meta-ExternalAgent, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 34/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 20/25

    • No author attribution found
  • 9% of the overall score

    12 external links, 0 citation phrases, 17 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 75/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Testimonials

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 76/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    15 of 39 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 1 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 5 percentages, 2 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 95/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/16/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 57/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    11 of 150 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 54/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 54/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card