Kuroma
legeverbum.com scores 30/100 for AI Readiness
Verbum (legeverbum.com) scores 30/100 (grade F) on AI Readiness, audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (68) and its weakest is Authority Signals (14); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected).
Audited URL: https://legeverbum.com
This audit is 36 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Is legeverbum.com ready for AI search?
Not yet: legeverbum.com scores 30/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.
Category scores
This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content
-
Found: 306 words, 2 paragraphs, 1 lists, 18 images (0 with alt text)
- Content length (306 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
- Limited use of lists for scannable content
- 18 images missing alt text
-
No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, Organization
-
Average 10 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
H1: 1, H2: 4, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.
-
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 18 of 18 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 18 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- This page has 18 images but only ~306 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
- 1 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.
Technical Optimization
-
2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
0 render-blocking resources. 262 elements for 306 words
-
Has viewport
-
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 1 placeholder links
- 1 of 5 links cannot be followed by a crawler
Authority Signals
-
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 0/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
1 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
-
Present: SSL, Privacy Policy
- No contact information easily accessible
AI Readiness
-
0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures
- No FAQ structure detected
-
0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
References current year
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
0 of 24 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 2 named versions or models.
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
-
Score: 18/100
-
This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none
- This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site →