Kuroma Kuroma

ytlooper.im scores 44/100 for AI Readiness

YouTube Looper (ytlooper.im) scores 44/100 (grade C) on AI Readiness, audited 11 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (67) and its weakest is Authority Signals (13); the biggest single gap is E-E-A-T Signals at 0/100 (No author attribution found).

Audited URL: https://ytlooper.im

44/100
Grade
C

This audit is 35 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 35 days ago

Is ytlooper.im ready for AI search?

Partly: ytlooper.im scores 44/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 67
Technical Optimization 53
Authority Signals 13
AI Readiness 43

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

Technical Optimization

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 80/100

    1 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    1 render-blocking resources. 624 elements for 1045 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 7 placeholder links

    • 7 of 35 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at ytlooper.im is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 0/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Fail 0/100

    0 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 35/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Contact

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 85/100

    2 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema, HowTo schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 33/100

    3 of 89 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 63/100

    Score: 63/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1045 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site →