Kuroma Kuroma

clickanalytic.com scores 63/100 for AI Readiness

Influencer Analytics & Fake Follower Detection (clickanalytic.com) is a MarTech / Influencer Marketing site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 63/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (77) and its weakest is AI Readiness (55); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 5 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 272 MarTech sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://clickanalytic.com

63/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Content Freshness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 5.7% of the total, which takes 5.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in MarTech Median 53 · Top quartile 59 · across 272 audited sites in MarTech

Is clickanalytic.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: clickanalytic.com scores 63/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 60
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 77
Authority Signals 25% of the score 64
AI Readiness 30% of the score 55

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts

    On https://clickanalytic.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://clickanalytic.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 5 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://clickanalytic.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +3.4 pts

    On https://clickanalytic.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 52/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +3.3 pts

    On https://clickanalytic.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 49/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 88/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1837 words, 41 paragraphs, 5 lists, 229 images (81 with alt text)

    • 148 images missing alt text (e.g. /home-assets/assets/creator-amber.webp?v=45ec2337, /home-assets/assets/creator-hannah.webp?v=e346a1ed, /home-assets/assets/creator-amber.webp?v=45ec2337)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 49/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ section found (no schema). 1 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, Organization, Service

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 5 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Pass 100/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 6 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 9, H3: 14. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Fail 17/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 148 of 229 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 62 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Click Analytic", "Click Analytic", "Click Analytic").
    • 201 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 229 images but only ~1837 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 81/100

    2% of the overall score

    5 render-blocking resources. 3068 elements for 1837 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 80/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 4 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 4 of 92 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 52/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 20/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    8 external links, 0 citation phrases, 73 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 82/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 61/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    14 of 24 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 70/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    1 original data indicators, 45 percentages, 3 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 62/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    21 of 171 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 78/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 78/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1837 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited MarTech / Influencer Marketing sites

Other MarTech / Influencer Marketing sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.