Kuroma Kuroma

idftw.com scores 38/100 for AI Readiness

週末戰士 真品裝備專賣 (idftw.com) scores 38/100 (grade D) on AI Readiness, audited 14 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (48) and its weakest is Authority Signals (30); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it below the median of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://idftw.com

38/100
Grade
D

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 39/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 7.9 points off the overall score.

Updated today

Below the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is idftw.com ready for AI search?

Not yet: idftw.com scores 38/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 37
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 48
Authority Signals 25% of the score 30
AI Readiness 30% of the score 40

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7.9 pts

    On https://idftw.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 39/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 6 of 74 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at idftw.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • Add lang attribute to HTML element
    • This page opens 25 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +7 pts

    On https://idftw.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 0/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://idftw.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Add Trust Signals up to +5.9 pts

    On https://idftw.com · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 34/100

    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
  5. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.3 pts

    On https://idftw.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 30/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • 6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 384 words, 6 paragraphs, 10 lists, 14 images (4 with alt text)

    • Content length (384 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 10 images missing alt text
  • 6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • 4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 5 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 75/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 5, H3: 1. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 26/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 10 of 14 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 2 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("cdn.store-assets.com, "cdn.store-assets.com) that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 1 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("PC-SPT2-CD5-MCM").
    • 11 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • 2% of the overall score

    22 render-blocking resources. 561 elements for 384 words

    • 22 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 78/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 2 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 39/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 6 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 6 of 74 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at idftw.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 0/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • 9% of the overall score

    20 external links, 0 citation phrases, 4 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 34/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Social profiles (5)

    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 41/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    0 of 6 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 1 comparison structures

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 30/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Fail 18/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References last year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 47/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    2 of 32 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 60/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 60/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    384 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card