Kuroma
claritythink.co scores 40/100 for AI Readiness
ClarityThink Consulting 澄思顧問 (claritythink.co) scores 40/100 (grade D) on AI Readiness, audited 5 Oct 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (55) and its weakest is Technical Optimization (29); the biggest single gap is Content Freshness at 0/100 (No recent year references in content). That places it above the median of the 31,104 sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://claritythink.co
The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 9/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 11.8 points off the overall score.
This audit is 27 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Above the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 31,104 audited sites
Is claritythink.co ready for AI search?
Not yet: claritythink.co scores 40/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Update Content Freshness.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +11.8 pts
On https://claritythink.co · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 9/100
- Missing canonical tag
- 11 of 15 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- Add canonical tag to prevent duplicate content issues
- Add lang attribute to HTML element
- This page opens 0 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
-
Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.1 pts
On https://claritythink.co · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 6/100
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
- Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
- Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
- Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
-
Add Trust Signals up to +6 pts
On https://claritythink.co · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 33/100
- No privacy policy link found
- Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
- Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
- Add customer testimonials or reviews
-
Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts
On https://claritythink.co · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
- Update statistics and data to 2026
- Add article:modified_time meta tag
- Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.3 pts
On https://claritythink.co · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 30/100
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 1,499 words, 19 paragraphs, 7 lists, 1 tables, 1 images (1 with alt text)
-
6.5% of the overall score
No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
4.5% of the overall score
No JSON-LD structured data found
-
3% of the overall score
Average 13 words/sentence. 8 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 4, H3: 4. Proper hierarchy.
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 1 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Jason Juan").
- 1 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
0 valid schemas
-
2% of the overall score
0 render-blocking resources. 367 elements for 1,499 words
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. No robots.txt, so nothing blocks AI crawlers. 11 placeholder links
- Missing canonical tag
- 11 of 15 links cannot be followed by a crawler
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 4/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
9% of the overall score
4 external links, 0 citation phrases, 7 statistics. No references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Contact, Social profiles (1)
- No privacy policy link found
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
5 of 9 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 1 comparison structures
- No FAQ structure detected
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.
-
5.7% of the overall score
No recent year references
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
5.1% of the overall score
4 of 87 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 4 named versions or models.
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 54/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
1,499 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this card