Kuroma Kuroma

claritythink.co scores 41/100 for AI Readiness

ClarityThink Consulting 澄思顧問 (claritythink.co) scores 41/100 (grade D) on AI Readiness, audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (57) and its weakest is Technical Optimization (28); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected).

Audited URL: https://Claritythink.co

41/100
Grade
D

This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 37 days ago

Is claritythink.co ready for AI search?

Not yet: claritythink.co scores 41/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 57
Technical Optimization 28
Authority Signals 38
AI Readiness 40

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Found: 1499 words, 19 paragraphs, 7 lists, 1 tables, 1 images (1 with alt text)

  • No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Partial 60/100

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Pass 81/100

    Average 13 words/sentence. 8 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    H1: 1, H2: 4, H3: 4. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 48/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Jason Juan").
    • 1 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization

  • 0 valid schemas

  • 0 render-blocking resources. 367 elements for 1499 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    Has viewport

  • HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 11 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 11 of 15 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at claritythink.co is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 27/100

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 4/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • 4 external links, 0 citation phrases, 7 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 40/100

    Present: SSL, Contact, Social Links

    • No privacy policy link found

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 40/100

    0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 1 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 22/100

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 47/100

    4 of 87 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 4 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 63/100

    Score: 63/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1499 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card