Kuroma Kuroma

www.asus.com scores 36/100 for AI Readiness

ASUS Global (www.asus.com) is a Manufacturing / Industrial site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 36/100 (grade D), audited 27 Oct 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (63) and its weakest is AI Readiness (20); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the one list or table this check found sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it below the median of the 2,971 Manufacturing / Industrial sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://www.asus.com

36/100
Grade
D

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 7.5 points off the overall score.

Updated 3 days ago

Below the median in Manufacturing / Industrial Median 37 · Top quartile 42 · across 2,971 audited sites in Manufacturing / Industrial

Is www.asus.com ready for AI search?

Not yet: www.asus.com scores 36/100 (grade D). Start with Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 35
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 63
Authority Signals 25% of the score 33
AI Readiness 30% of the score 20

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://www.asus.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +6.5 pts

    On https://www.asus.com · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 10/100

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
    • Add a section heading followed by 25 to 200 words that answer it on their own, so an assistant can lift the answer without the rest of the page
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add FAQ section with common questions about your topic
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://www.asus.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  4. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +5.6 pts

    On https://www.asus.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 57/100

    • The response at www.asus.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • This page opens 92 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at www.asus.com — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  5. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +5.5 pts

    On https://www.asus.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 15/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Needs work 45/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 374 words, 37 images (36 with alt text)

    • Content length (374 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
    • 1 images missing alt text (e.g. /WebsitesBanner/global/banners/41kkmmhsvgmijdnq/41kkmmhsvgmijdnq-2_0_desktop_2_1X.webp)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 15/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Corporation, WebSite

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the one list or table this check found sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 6 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 65/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 1, H3: 1. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 48/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 of 34 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 6 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("ROG", "ProArt", "ASUS IoT").
    • 27 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 34 images but only ~374 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 41/100

    2% of the overall score

    25 render-blocking resources. 1,000 elements for 374 words

    • 25 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 28 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 57/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable)

    • The response at www.asus.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 21/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    12 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 39/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy

    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 10/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    0 of 2 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 1 comparison structures

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 5/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 45 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 2 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 59/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 59/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    374 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Manufacturing / Industrial sites

Other Manufacturing / Industrial sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.