Kuroma Kuroma

iptvplaylist.app scores 43/100 for AI Readiness

Public IPTV Playlist Directory & Free M3U Tools (iptvplaylist.app) scores 43/100 (grade C) on AI Readiness, audited 1 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (67) and its weakest is Authority Signals (14); the biggest single gap is External Citations & References at 0/100 (Few external citations to authoritative sources). That places it above the median of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://iptvplaylist.app

43/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 9 points off the overall score.

This audit is 13 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 13 days ago

Above the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is iptvplaylist.app ready for AI search?

Partly: iptvplaylist.app scores 43/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add External Citations & References.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 67
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 61
Authority Signals 25% of the score 14
AI Readiness 30% of the score 35

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add External Citations & References up to +9 pts

    On https://iptvplaylist.app · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 0/100

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
    • Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6.3 pts

    On https://iptvplaylist.app · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 10/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Add Trust Signals up to +6.2 pts

    On https://iptvplaylist.app · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 31/100

    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
  4. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +6.1 pts

    On https://iptvplaylist.app · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 53/100

    • 3 of 79 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at iptvplaylist.app is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • This page opens 62 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at iptvplaylist.app — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  5. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6 pts

    On https://iptvplaylist.app · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 20/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 85/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1570 words, 89 paragraphs, 5 lists, 56 images (2 with alt text)

    • 54 images missing alt text (e.g. /images/home/hero.webp, /images/home/sports.webp, /images/home/football.webp)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 88/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 10 question headings. 4 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 9/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types:

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 13 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 93/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 10, H3: 22. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 27/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 54 of 56 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 4 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 56 images but only ~1570 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 80/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 90/100

    2% of the overall score

    3 render-blocking resources. 745 elements for 1570 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 68/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 53/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 3 placeholder links

    • 3 of 79 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at iptvplaylist.app is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 10/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Fail 0/100

    9% of the overall score

    0 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 31/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Privacy Policy, Legal notice

    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 72/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    5 of 33 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 20/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 3 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 106 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 80/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 80/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1570 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card