Kuroma
opcommedical.com scores 39/100 for AI Readiness
OPCOM Medical Inc. 敦揚醫學科技股份有限公司 (opcommedical.com) scores 39/100 (grade D) on AI Readiness, audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (56) and its weakest is AI Readiness (28); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected).
Audited URL: https://Opcommedical.com
This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Is opcommedical.com ready for AI search?
Not yet: opcommedical.com scores 39/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.
Category scores
This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content
-
Found: 876 words, 28 lists, 1 tables, 18 images (10 with alt text)
- Content length (876 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
- 8 images missing alt text (e.g. /upload/images/2025031416402181358.jpg, /upload/images/2025031416402170270.jpg, /upload/images/20250814101520lwqyv.jpg)
-
No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
No JSON-LD structured data found
-
Average 13 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
H1: 3, H2: 5, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.
- Multiple H1 headings (3) - should have exactly one
-
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 8 of 18 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 9 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("6BANNER_r1_c2.jpg", "www.opcommedical.com _1_.jpg", "234.jpg") that tells AI nothing about the content.
- 1 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("About us").
- 18 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
Technical Optimization
-
0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph
-
21 render-blocking resources. 635 elements for 876 words
- 21 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
-
Has viewport. has theme-color
-
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 8 placeholder links
- 8 of 111 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- The response at opcommedical.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
Authority Signals
-
Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 21/25. Authority: 4/10. Trust: 10/25. Has author
-
2 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
-
Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social Links
AI Readiness
-
0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 1 comparison structures
- No FAQ structure detected
-
0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
References last year. Last modified: 10/28/2025
- Content appears to be over 6 months old
-
0 of 53 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
-
Score: 85/100
-
876 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this card