Kuroma Kuroma

nine9.jic-tools.com.tw scores 39/100 for AI Readiness

Taiwan Cutting Tools (nine9.jic-tools.com.tw) scores 39/100 (grade D) on AI Readiness, audited 17 Oct 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (48) and its weakest is On-Page Content (31); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 3 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it above the median of the 31,080 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://nine9.jic-tools.com.tw

39/100
Grade
D

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 41/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 7.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 13 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 13 days ago

Above the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 31,080 audited sites

Is nine9.jic-tools.com.tw ready for AI search?

Not yet: nine9.jic-tools.com.tw scores 39/100 (grade D). Start with Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 31
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 48
Authority Signals 25% of the score 40
AI Readiness 30% of the score 38

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7.7 pts

    On https://nine9.jic-tools.com.tw · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 41/100

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 7 of 81 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at nine9.jic-tools.com.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Add canonical tag to prevent duplicate content issues
    • This page opens 43 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6.8 pts

    On https://nine9.jic-tools.com.tw · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 10/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.1 pts

    On https://nine9.jic-tools.com.tw · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 6/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.5 pts

    On https://nine9.jic-tools.com.tw · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 21/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +5.1 pts

    On https://nine9.jic-tools.com.tw · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 43/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • 6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 422 words, 3 lists, 36 images (31 with alt text)

    • Content length (422 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 5 images missing alt text (e.g. /upload_files/Banner/Nine9_ACE_Spot_Drill.jpg, /upload_files/Banner/Deburring_and_threading_Mill_Nine9.jpg, /upload_files/Banner/0.1__0.2_mm_Micro_spot_drill_and_engraving_tool_90_120_142_degree_Nine9.jpg)
  • 6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • 4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 3 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 61/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 12 words/sentence. 4 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Needs work 35/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 2, H2: 0, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.

    • Multiple H1 headings (2) - should have exactly one
    • Insufficient section headings to break the content up
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 38/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 5 of 36 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 16 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("search", "ESG", "Spot Drill").
    • 27 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 36 images but only ~422 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • 1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization

  • 2% of the overall score

    23 render-blocking resources. 326 elements for 422 words

    • 23 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 7 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 7 of 81 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at nine9.jic-tools.com.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 21/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • 9% of the overall score

    5 external links, 0 citation phrases, 1 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 51/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Contact

    • No privacy policy link found

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 47/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    2 of 2 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 10/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 54/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    3 of 21 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 2 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 43/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 43/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    422 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card