Kuroma Kuroma

www.omiyoga.com scores 43/100 for AI Readiness

YOGA ACADEMY (www.omiyoga.com) scores 43/100 (grade C) on AI Readiness, audited 8 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (51) and its weakest is On-Page Content (35); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it above the median of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://www.omiyoga.com

43/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 35/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 8.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 7 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 7 days ago

Above the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is www.omiyoga.com ready for AI search?

Partly: www.omiyoga.com scores 43/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 35
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 51
Authority Signals 25% of the score 37
AI Readiness 30% of the score 49

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +8.5 pts

    On https://www.omiyoga.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 35/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 10 of 43 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.omiyoga.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 14 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6.7 pts

    On https://www.omiyoga.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 4/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://www.omiyoga.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.1 pts

    On https://www.omiyoga.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 32/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +5.1 pts

    On https://www.omiyoga.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 65/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 376 words, 36 paragraphs, 6 lists, 22 images (16 with alt text)

    • Content length (376 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 6 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 9/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: LocalBusiness, WebSite

  • AI Readability Score Partial 69/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 57/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 5, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 29/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 6 of 22 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 9 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("Omi_Yoga_Banner-e1505787815976-2000x523.png", "half_size_1644539836602_offering_image.jpg", "MYR_3.jpg") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 5 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("OMIYOGA Facebook", "OMIYOGA Instagram", "OMIYOGA Threads").
    • 9 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 71/100

    2% of the overall score

    4 render-blocking resources. 958 elements for 376 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 18 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 35/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 10 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 10 of 43 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.omiyoga.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 4/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 4/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    10 external links, 0 citation phrases, 7 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 46/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Social profiles (4)

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 58/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    4 of 15 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 32/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 76/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 7/1/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 33 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 76/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 76/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    376 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card