Kuroma Kuroma

humetric.net scores 52/100 for AI Readiness

HuMetric (humetric.net) scores 52/100 (grade B) on AI Readiness, audited 20 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (66) and its weakest is AI Readiness (40); the biggest single gap is Unique Value Proposition at 0/100 (No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check). That places it in the top quartile of the 31,080 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: http://humetric.net

52/100
Grade
B

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 12/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 6.6 points off the overall score.

This audit is 40 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 40 days ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 31,080 audited sites

Is humetric.net ready for AI search?

Mostly, with gaps: humetric.net scores 52/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 60
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 66
Authority Signals 25% of the score 47
AI Readiness 30% of the score 40

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6.6 pts

    On http://humetric.net · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 12/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +5.1 pts

    On http://humetric.net · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  3. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5 pts

    On http://humetric.net · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 29/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +5 pts

    On http://humetric.net · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 45/100

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
    • Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
  5. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +4.7 pts

    On http://humetric.net · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 64/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 3 of 22 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 11 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 55/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 620 words, 26 paragraphs, 2 lists, 4 images (0 with alt text)

    • Content length (620 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 4 images missing alt text (e.g. /brand/logo-black.svg?dpl=dpl_FYg7puUJUwttf9hg7DZ6n28j4iAY, /brand/logo-white.svg?dpl=dpl_FYg7puUJUwttf9hg7DZ6n28j4iAY, /brand/logo-black.svg?dpl=dpl_FYg7puUJUwttf9hg7DZ6n28j4iAY)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 85/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 6 question headings. 3 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 26/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, SoftwareApplication, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 78/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 6, H3: 14. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Fail 23/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 4 of 4 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 78/100

    2% of the overall score

    9 render-blocking resources. 438 elements for 620 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 64/100

    13% of the overall score

    No HTTPS. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 3 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 3 of 22 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 29/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 45/100

    9% of the overall score

    1 external links, 0 citation phrases, 3 statistics. Has references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 64/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Social profiles (1)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 90/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    13 of 24 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 3 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 12/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 3 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 51/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 7/12/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 55 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 51/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 51/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card