Kuroma Kuroma

www.brakes-tech.com scores 34/100 for AI Readiness

BRAKES TECH (www.brakes-tech.com) scores 34/100 (grade F) on AI Readiness, audited 28 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (48) and its weakest is Authority Signals (13); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it below the median of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://www.brakes-tech.com

34/100
Grade
F

The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 8/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 8.3 points off the overall score.

This audit is 18 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 18 days ago

Below the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is www.brakes-tech.com ready for AI search?

Not yet: www.brakes-tech.com scores 34/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 31
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 48
Authority Signals 25% of the score 13
AI Readiness 30% of the score 43

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add External Citations & References up to +8.3 pts

    On https://www.brakes-tech.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 8/100

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
    • Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  2. Add Trust Signals up to +8.1 pts

    On https://www.brakes-tech.com · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 10/100

    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
  3. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7.4 pts

    On https://www.brakes-tech.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 43/100

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 8 of 42 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Add canonical tag to prevent duplicate content issues
    • This page opens 20 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  4. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://www.brakes-tech.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  5. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6 pts

    On https://www.brakes-tech.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 20/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 51/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 268 words, 3 paragraphs, 3 lists, 35 images (18 with alt text)

    • Content length (268 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 17 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 2 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Pass 95/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 4 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Needs work 36/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 2, H3: 4. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 27/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 17 of 35 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 11 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Brake Kit", "Brake Pad", "PORSCHE").
    • 33 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 35 images but only ~268 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Fail 20/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 59/100

    2% of the overall score

    20 render-blocking resources. 497 elements for 268 words

    • 20 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 68/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 43/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 8 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 8 of 42 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 22/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 17/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Fail 8/100

    9% of the overall score

    0 external links, 0 citation phrases, 1 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 10/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Privacy Policy

    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 33/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    1 of 9 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 20/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    1 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Pass 79/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/7/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 49/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    2 of 15 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 60/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 60/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site →