Kuroma Kuroma

thg.co.jp scores 44/100 for AI Readiness

�y�n�Ɖ������m�E���ʎm�Ȃǂ̖@�����i�̍��i�w���b�����@�o�w�@ (thg.co.jp) is a Online Learning / Course Platform site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 44/100 (grade C), audited 16 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (67) and its weakest is AI Readiness (31); the biggest single gap is Citation-Worthiness at 0/100 (Limited use of specific statistics). That places it above the median of the 208 Online Learning / Course Platform sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://thg.co.jp

44/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 7.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 44 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 44 days ago

Above the median in Online Learning / Course Platform Median 41 · Top quartile 46 · across 208 audited sites in Online Learning / Course Platform

Is thg.co.jp ready for AI search?

Partly: thg.co.jp scores 44/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Expand Content Depth & Comprehensiveness.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 53
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 67
Authority Signals 25% of the score 32
AI Readiness 30% of the score 31

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://thg.co.jp · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6.4 pts

    On https://thg.co.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 9/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://thg.co.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  4. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +5.3 pts

    On https://thg.co.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 18/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +5.1 pts

    On https://thg.co.jp · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 70/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 260 words, 12 paragraphs, 23 lists, 62 images (57 with alt text)

    • Content length (260 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 5 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 18/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ section found (no schema). 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Partial 55/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types:

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 4 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 84/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 7, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 31/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 5 of 62 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 54 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("�@�����i�̍u���͓����@�o�w�@", "�d�b�ԍ��@03-6228-1453", "���{���I�b�y���w�Ҍ��ʐM����z�V�E�ŒZ���i�u�� �����L�����y�[���I�b�����@�o�w�@").
    • 30 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 62 images but only ~260 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Fail 10/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas, 1 invalid

    • 1 invalid JSON-LD schema(s) detected (engines fall back to reading them as plain text)
  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 49/100

    2% of the overall score

    20 render-blocking resources. 712 elements for 260 words

    • 20 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 77/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 7 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 7 of 129 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 9/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    7 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 47/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (3)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 58/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    3 of 8 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 54/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 9/10/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 20 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 25/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 25/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 92/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    260 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Online Learning / Course Platform sites

Other Online Learning / Course Platform sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.