Kuroma Kuroma

www.fluv.com scores 56/100 for AI Readiness

Fluv (www.fluv.com) scores 56/100 (grade B) on AI Readiness, audited 14 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (66) and its weakest is AI Readiness (43); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the one list or table this check found sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://www.fluv.com

56/100
Grade
B

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 41/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 7.7 points off the overall score.

Updated 1 day ago

Top 25% of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is www.fluv.com ready for AI search?

Mostly, with gaps: www.fluv.com scores 56/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Update Content Freshness.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 66
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 54
Authority Signals 25% of the score 65
AI Readiness 30% of the score 43

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7.7 pts

    On https://www.fluv.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 41/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 2 of 80 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.fluv.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 28 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts

    On https://www.fluv.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.3 pts

    On https://www.fluv.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 30/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://www.fluv.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the one list or table this check found sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.4 pts

    On https://www.fluv.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 37/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 75/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3,108 words, 32 paragraphs, 2 lists, 60 images (0 with alt text)

    • 60 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 96/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 11 question headings. 5 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, FAQPage

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the one list or table this check found sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 90/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 2, H2: 13, H3: 24. Proper hierarchy.

    • Multiple H1 headings (2) - should have exactly one
  • Media Accessibility Fail 22/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 60 of 60 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 51 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 78/100

    2% of the overall score

    8 render-blocking resources. 929 elements for 3,108 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 28 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 2 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 2 of 80 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.fluv.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 37/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 13/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Pass 85/100

    9% of the overall score

    21 external links, 9 citation phrases, 22 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 66/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Testimonials, Social profiles (4)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 67/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    24 of 39 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 30/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 2 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 42/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    16 of 161 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 73/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 73/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3,108 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card