Kuroma Kuroma

impact.com scores 62/100 for AI Readiness

impact.com is a MarTech / Partnership Management site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 62/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (79) and its weakest is AI Readiness (50); the biggest single gap is Citation-Worthiness at 30/100 (0 original data indicators, 20 percentages, 0 quotes.). That places it in the top quartile of the 272 MarTech sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://impact.com

62/100
Grade
A

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 30/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 5.3 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Top 25% in MarTech Median 53 · Top quartile 59 · across 272 audited sites in MarTech

Is impact.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: impact.com scores 62/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 55
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 79
Authority Signals 25% of the score 68
AI Readiness 30% of the score 50

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.3 pts

    On https://impact.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 30/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +4.5 pts

    On https://impact.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 31/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://impact.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  4. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +3.8 pts

    On https://impact.com · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 47/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • 10 of your 54 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
  5. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +3.3 pts

    On https://impact.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 75/100

    • 32 of 196 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing
    • This page opens 79 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • robots.txt asks crawlers to wait 5s between requests, which limits how much of this site they reach

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1975 words, 65 paragraphs, 26 lists, 41 images (29 with alt text)

    • 12 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 31/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 2 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 32/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization

  • AI Readability Score Partial 61/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 23 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 70/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 2, H2: 25, H3: 13. Hierarchy issues.

    • Multiple H1 headings (2) - should have exactly one
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 42/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 12 of 41 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 5 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Impact.com logo", "G2 award", "Dollar icon").
    • 24 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 41 images but only ~1975 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    12 render-blocking resources. 1118 elements for 1975 words

    • 12 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 93/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 26 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 75/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 32 placeholder links

    • 32 of 196 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 72/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 18/25. Authority: 22/25. Trust: 17/25. Has author

  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    10 external links, 0 citation phrases, 22 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 77/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 47/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    10 of 54 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 30/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 20 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Partial 62/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references. Last modified: 6/10/2026

    • No recent year references in content
  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 54/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    9 of 132 passages carry a figure, 4 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 52/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 52/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1975 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card