Kuroma Kuroma

image-model.com scores 33/100 for AI Readiness

IMAGE Model (image-model.com) scores 33/100 (grade F) on AI Readiness, audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (50) and its weakest is AI Readiness (22); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 10 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar).

Audited URL: https://image-model.com

33/100
Grade
F

This audit is 36 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 36 days ago

Is image-model.com ready for AI search?

Not yet: image-model.com scores 33/100 (grade F). Start with Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 50
Technical Optimization 38
Authority Signals 26
AI Readiness 22

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Found: 528 words, 39 paragraphs, 11 lists, 17 images (17 with alt text)

    • Content length (528 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
  • No FAQ structure. 3 question headings. 2 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 10 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    Average 10 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 75/100

    H1: 1, H2: 0, H3: 5. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 31/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("logo") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 15 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Small-Volume Production", "Model-Making", "Color Development").
    • 15 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 17 images but only ~528 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 30/100

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • 9 render-blocking resources. 453 elements for 528 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 26/100

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 15 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 15 of 83 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at image-model.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 25/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 7/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • 1 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 38/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social Links

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 50/100

    0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • 0 of 20 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 45/100

    Score: 45/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    528 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card