Kuroma Kuroma

tancom.ph scores 34/100 for AI Readiness

Tancom Technology (tancom.ph) scores 34/100 (grade F) on AI Readiness, audited 11 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (55) and its weakest is AI Readiness (18); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected).

Audited URL: https://tancom.ph

34/100
Grade
F

This audit is 35 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 35 days ago

Is tancom.ph ready for AI search?

Not yet: tancom.ph scores 34/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Expand Content Depth & Comprehensiveness.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 42
Technical Optimization 55
Authority Signals 27
AI Readiness 18

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 68/100

    Found: 309 words, 8 paragraphs, 11 lists, 70 images (56 with alt text)

    • Content length (309 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 14 images missing alt text (e.g. //tancom.ph/cdn/shop/files/badges-core-ultra-processor-family-5-7-9-center_1920-1080.webp?v=1784518736&width=533, //tancom.ph/cdn/shop/files/badges-core-ultra-processor-family-5-7-9-center_1920-1080_bf3b835…
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 30/100

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Pass 80/100

    Average 4 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 65/100

    H1: 0, H2: 0, H3: 5. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 37/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 14 of 70 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 30 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("TANCOM TECHNOLOGY", "TANCOM TECHNOLOGY", "qrph").
    • 34 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 70 images but only ~309 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 40/100

    20 render-blocking resources. 1289 elements for 309 words

    • 20 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
    • The page spends 1289 HTML elements on 309 words of content, so crawlers parse far more markup than answer
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 93/100

    Has viewport. 62 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 47/100

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 25 placeholder links

    • 25 of 113 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at tancom.ph is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 27/100

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 6/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Fail 23/100

    1 external links, 0 citation phrases, 1 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 32/100

    Present: SSL, Contact

    • No privacy policy link found

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 20/100

    0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    0 of 9 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 85/100

    Score: 85/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    309 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card