Kuroma Kuroma

mermaidflow.app scores 46/100 for AI Readiness

Online Mermaid Visual Editor (mermaidflow.app) scores 46/100 (grade C) on AI Readiness, audited 16 Jul 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (76) and its weakest is Authority Signals (29); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No JSON-LD structured data found).

Audited URL: https://mermaidflow.app

46/100
Grade
C

This audit is 62 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 62 days ago

Is mermaidflow.app ready for AI search?

Partly: mermaidflow.app scores 46/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Implement Comprehensive Schema Markup and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

This audit did not record which rubric version scored it, so it is not confirmed as the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 44
Technical Optimization 76
Authority Signals 29
AI Readiness 41

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 72/100

    Found: 969 words, 3 paragraphs, 2 lists, 24 images (24 with alt text)

    • Content length (969 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 33/100

    No FAQ structure. 4 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No JSON-LD structured data found
  • AI Readability Score Pass 75/100

    Average 2 words/sentence. 5 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Needs work 41/100

    H1: 3, H2: 5, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Multiple H1 headings (3) - should have exactly one
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 39/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 19 images have generic or filename-only alt text (e.g. "image", "chart", a filename) that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 24 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 24 images but only ~969 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 20/100

    Experience: 0/25. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 30/100

    0 external links, 1 citation phrases, 82 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 35/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 45/100

    5 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 tables

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Partial 50/100

    0 original data indicators, 64 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 25/100

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No article publish/modified dates in metadata
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 10/100

    1 unique value phrases, 0 differentiators, 0 case study mentions.

    • No case studies or concrete examples found
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 60/100

    Score: 60/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    969 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card