Kuroma Kuroma

ezgo.ardswc.gov.tw scores 37/100 for AI Readiness

農業易遊網 (ezgo.ardswc.gov.tw) scores 37/100 (grade D) on AI Readiness, audited 2 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (68) and its weakest is Authority Signals (16); the biggest single gap is External Citations & References at 0/100 (Few external citations to authoritative sources).

Audited URL: https://ezgo.ardswc.gov.tw/

37/100
Grade
D

This audit is 45 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 45 days ago

Is ezgo.ardswc.gov.tw ready for AI search?

Not yet: ezgo.ardswc.gov.tw scores 37/100 (grade D). Start with Expand Content Depth & Comprehensiveness and Add External Citations & References.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-02, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 42
Technical Optimization 68
Authority Signals 16
AI Readiness 28

The 15 checks this audit confirms it scored

Every check this audit confirms it scored, with what it found on the page. 2 more checks were not scored on this page and are listed below with no score. 2 other checks are listed without a share of the score, because this audit cannot confirm whether they counted on this page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Needs work 38/100

    Found: 59 words, 5 paragraphs, 28 lists, 36 images (0 with alt text)

    • Content length (59 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 36 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    FAQ section found (no schema). 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 30/100

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Pass 80/100

    Average 15 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Needs work 30/100

    H1: 1, H2: 0, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Insufficient H2 headings for content sections
  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 36 of 36 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 36 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 36 images but only ~59 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
    • 3 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 8/100

    Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out

    Experience: 0/25. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Fail 0/100

    0 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 38/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Social Links

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 28/100

    0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 tables

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 20/100

    Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 40/100

    References current year

    • No article publish/modified dates in metadata
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 8/100

    0 unique value phrases, 1 differentiators, 0 case study mentions.

    • No case studies or concrete examples found
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 60/100

    Score: 60/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Needs work 30/100

    59 words readable without JavaScript

    • Only 59 words are readable without JavaScript; AI crawlers run no JavaScript and will see very little of this page.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site →