Kuroma Kuroma

jic-tools.com.tw scores 31/100 for AI Readiness

Nine9 Cutting Tools (jic-tools.com.tw) scores 31/100 (grade F) on AI Readiness, audited 17 Oct 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (41) and its weakest is Authority Signals (18); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it below the median of the 31,056 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://jic-tools.com.tw

31/100
Grade
F

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 29/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 9.2 points off the overall score.

This audit is 8 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 8 days ago

Below the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 31,056 audited sites

Is jic-tools.com.tw ready for AI search?

Not yet: jic-tools.com.tw scores 31/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 27
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 41
Authority Signals 25% of the score 18
AI Readiness 30% of the score 40

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +9.2 pts

    On https://www.jic-tools.com.tw/ · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 29/100

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 4 of 16 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • We could not fetch jic-tools.com.tw, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Add canonical tag to prevent duplicate content issues
    • This page opens 8 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +8.3 pts

    On https://www.jic-tools.com.tw/ · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 8/100

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
    • Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6.8 pts

    On https://www.jic-tools.com.tw/ · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 10/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  4. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://www.jic-tools.com.tw/ · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  5. Add Trust Signals up to +6.4 pts

    On https://www.jic-tools.com.tw/ · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 29/100

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
    • Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
    • Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Needs work 44/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 331 words, 2 lists, 9 images (7 with alt text)

    • Content length (331 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 2 images missing alt text (e.g. /themes/jictools2/images/Jimmore-footer-iso.png, /themes/jictools2/images/Jimmore-footer-iso_2.png)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the one list or table this check found sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 73/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Needs work 35/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 0, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.

    • Insufficient section headings to break the content up
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 43/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 2 of 9 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 6 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Nine9", "Nine9", "SLOKY").
    • This page has 9 images but only ~331 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Partial 60/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    15 render-blocking resources. 143 elements for 331 words

    • 15 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 29/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 4 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 4 of 16 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • We could not fetch jic-tools.com.tw, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 18/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 6/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Fail 8/100

    9% of the overall score

    0 external links, 0 citation phrases, 1 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 29/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Publisher schema (5 identity properties)

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 51/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    1 of 1 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 10/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 59/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 9/9/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 40/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    1 of 11 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 2 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 27/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 27/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    331 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site →