Kuroma
worklog.ai scores 31/100 for AI Readiness
Worklog (worklog.ai) scores 31/100 (grade F) on AI Readiness, audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (36) and its weakest is AI Readiness (20); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected).
Audited URL: https://worklog.ai
This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Is worklog.ai ready for AI search?
Not yet: worklog.ai scores 31/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Expand Content Depth & Comprehensiveness.
Category scores
This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content
-
Found: 245 words, 15 paragraphs, 28 lists, 82 images (0 with alt text)
- Content length (245 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
- 82 images missing alt text.png, cdn.prod.website-files.com, cdn.prod.website-files.com).png)
-
No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
No JSON-LD structured data found
-
Average 6 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
H1: 7, H2: 6, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.
- Multiple H1 headings (7) - should have exactly one
- Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
-
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 82 of 82 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 45 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- This page has 82 images but only ~245 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
Technical Optimization
-
0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph
-
7 render-blocking resources. 683 elements for 245 words
-
Has viewport. 5 responsive images
-
HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 15 placeholder links
- Missing canonical tag
- 15 of 37 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- We could not fetch worklog.ai, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
Authority Signals
-
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 4/10. Trust: 4/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
12 external links, 0 citation phrases, 4 statistics. No references section.
-
Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Social Links
- No contact information easily accessible
AI Readiness
-
0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures
- No FAQ structure detected
-
0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
No recent year references
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
2 of 36 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
-
Score: 36/100
-
245 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this card