Kuroma Kuroma

murata.com scores 49/100 for AI Readiness

murata.com is a Manufacturing / Industrial site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 49/100 (grade C), audited 15 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (62) and its weakest is AI Readiness (38); the biggest single gap is Citation-Worthiness at 0/100 (Limited use of specific statistics). That places it in the top quartile of the 2,888 Manufacturing / Industrial sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://murata.com

49/100
Grade
C

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 7.5 points off the overall score.

Updated today

Top 25% in Manufacturing / Industrial Median 37 · Top quartile 42 · across 2,888 audited sites in Manufacturing / Industrial

Is murata.com ready for AI search?

Partly: murata.com scores 49/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Add FAQ Schema Markup and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 55
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 62
Authority Signals 25% of the score 46
AI Readiness 30% of the score 38

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://murata.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.1 pts

    On https://murata.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 6/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  3. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +5.6 pts

    On https://murata.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 57/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • The response at murata.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at murata.com — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  4. Add Trust Signals up to +4.7 pts

    On https://murata.com · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 48/100

    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +4.5 pts

    On https://murata.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 50/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 4,888 words, 36 paragraphs, 139 lists, 48 tables, 75 images (43 with alt text)

    • 32 images missing alt text (e.g. /-/media/webrenewal/home/asset/img/herobanner/sims-sp-herobanner.ashx?la=en&cvid=20230531080239000000, /-/media/webrenewal/home/asset/img/herobanner/24f-forum-sp-en.ashx?la=en&cvid=20241030015552000000, /-/…
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 6/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 34/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 75/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 11, H3: 4. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 40/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 32 of 75 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 23 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Capacitor", "Inductors", "Resistor").
    • 65 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Partial 60/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    15 render-blocking resources. 4,532 elements for 4,888 words

    • 15 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 35 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 57/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 15 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • The response at murata.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 40/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 17/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 50/100

    9% of the overall score

    18 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 48/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 55/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    9 of 20 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 48 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Pass 83/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 9/10/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 11/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    2 of 461 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 2 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 69/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 69/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Manufacturing / Industrial sites

Other Manufacturing / Industrial sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.