Kuroma Kuroma

innowing.tw scores 33/100 for AI Readiness

創翼空間 InnoWing (innowing.tw) scores 33/100 (grade F) on AI Readiness, audited 15 Jul 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (91) and its weakest is Authority Signals (13); the biggest single gap is Heading Hierarchy at 0/100 (Missing H1 heading).

Audited URL: https://innowing.tw

33/100
Grade
F

This audit is 63 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 63 days ago

Is innowing.tw ready for AI search?

Not yet: innowing.tw scores 33/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Expand Content Depth & Comprehensiveness.

Category scores

This audit did not record which rubric version scored it, so it is not confirmed as the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 21
Technical Optimization 91
Authority Signals 13
AI Readiness 20

The 16 checks this audit confirms it scored

Every check this audit confirms it scored, with what it found on the page. 3 other checks are listed without a share of the score, because this audit cannot confirm whether they counted on this page.

On-Page Content

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Needs work 42/100

    Found: 408 words, 1 lists, 130 images (2 with alt text)

    • Content length (408 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
    • 128 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 30/100

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite

  • AI Readability Score Needs work 32/100

    Average 18 words/sentence. 4 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Fail 0/100

    H1: 0, H2: 0, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
    • Insufficient H2 headings for content sections
  • Media Accessibility Fail 10/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 128 of 130 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 2 images have generic or filename-only alt text (e.g. "image", "chart", a filename) that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 130 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 130 images but only ~408 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 0/100

    Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out

    Experience: 0/25. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Fail 10/100

    0 external links, 2 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 27/100

    Present: SSL, Testimonials

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 12/100

    0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 tables

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    Not counted in every language, and this audit did not record the language this page was scored in, so its share of the score is left out

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 43/100

    References last year

    • No article publish/modified dates in metadata
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    0 unique value phrases, 0 differentiators, 0 case study mentions.

    • No case studies or concrete examples found
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 43/100

    Score: 43/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    408 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card