spdload.com scores 69/100 for AI Readiness
Custom Software Development Services for Startups (spdload.com) is a software industry site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 69/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (88) and its weakest is AI Readiness (51); the biggest single gap is Unique Value Proposition at 9/100 (2 of 183 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.). That places it in the top quartile of the 3,299 Technology sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://spdload.com
The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 22/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 5.9 points off the overall score.
This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Top 25% in Technology Median 46 · Top quartile 53 · across 3,299 audited sites in Technology
Is spdload.com ready for AI search?
Largely yes: spdload.com scores 69/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Unique Value Proposition.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +5.9 pts
On https://spdload.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 22/100
- Limited use of specific statistics
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Add External Citations & References up to +5.1 pts
On https://spdload.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 43/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
- Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.6 pts
On https://spdload.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 9/100
- Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
- Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
- Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
-
Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.6 pts
On https://spdload.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 20/100
- Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
-
Update Content Freshness up to +2.3 pts
On https://spdload.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 59/100
- No recent year references in content
- Update statistics and data to 2026
- Add article:modified_time meta tag
- Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 2538 words, 69 paragraphs, 37 lists, 151 images (126 with alt text)
- 25 images missing alt text
-
6.5% of the overall score
FAQ schema present. 7 question headings. 4 questions detected in content
-
4.5% of the overall score
2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: BreadcrumbList, LocalBusiness, Organization, WebPage, WebSite, FAQPage
-
3% of the overall score
Average 9 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 11, H3: 6. Proper hierarchy.
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 25 of 151 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 65 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("Icon", "Icon", "Icon") that tells AI nothing about the content.
- 44 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("SPDload Logo", "Colin Millward", "Play").
- 72 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
0 render-blocking resources. 1894 elements for 2538 words
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. 68 responsive images. has theme-color
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 22 placeholder links
- 22 of 218 links cannot be followed by a crawler
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 7/10. Expertise: 21/25. Authority: 19/25. Trust: 20/25. Has author
-
9% of the overall score
10 external links, 0 citation phrases, 2 statistics. No references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Publisher schema (6 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (2)
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
6 of 18 headings open a quotable passage, 3 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 2 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
5.7% of the overall score
No recent year references. Last modified: 3/5/2026
- No recent year references in content
-
5.1% of the overall score
2 of 183 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 80/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
2538 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this cardOther audited software industry sites
- AI Software Development & Nearshore Teams (stepto.net) · 72/100
- Custom Software Team in Perth (nanosolutions.io) · 72/100
- Discentra (discentra.ai) · 71/100
- WhatsApp Marketing & Lead Generation Software (novynix.com) · 70/100
- 官方網站 (norton.com) · 68/100
- KIRA (kiraco.org) · 67/100
Other software industry sites without a public score card
No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.