Kuroma Kuroma

aws.amazon.com scores 52/100 for AI Readiness

Cloud Computing Services (aws.amazon.com) is a IT Infrastructure / Cloud site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 52/100 (grade B), audited 24 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (82) and its weakest is AI Readiness (33); the biggest single gap is Citation-Worthiness at 0/100 (Limited use of specific statistics). That places it in the top quartile of the 446 IT Infrastructure / Cloud sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://aws.amazon.com

52/100
Grade
B

The most points to recover are in Citation-Worthiness: it scored 0/100 on a check worth 7.5% of the total, which takes 7.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 22 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 22 days ago

Top 25% in IT Infrastructure / Cloud Median 41 · Top quartile 47 · across 446 audited sites in IT Infrastructure / Cloud

Is aws.amazon.com ready for AI search?

Mostly, with gaps: aws.amazon.com scores 52/100 (grade B). The gaps to close are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 58
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 82
Authority Signals 25% of the score 43
AI Readiness 30% of the score 33

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://aws.amazon.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +6.1 pts

    On https://aws.amazon.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 9/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +5.1 pts

    On https://aws.amazon.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 43/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5 pts

    On https://aws.amazon.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 28/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.7 pts

    On https://aws.amazon.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 8/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim

The 17 checks scored on this page

Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 2 more checks were not scored on this page and are listed below with no score.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 80/100

    9.7% of the overall score

    Found: 1432 words, 10 paragraphs, 15 lists, 19 images (14 with alt text)

    • 5 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    No FAQ structure. 5 question headings. 3 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 9/100

    6.7% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: ItemList

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 73/100

    4.1% of the overall score

    H1: 2, H2: 9, H3: 2. Hierarchy issues.

    • Multiple H1 headings (2) - should have exactly one
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 7 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("An abstract image", "An abstract image", "An abstract image").
    • 6 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Partial 50/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 59/100

    2% of the overall score

    13 render-blocking resources. 2348 elements for 1432 words

    • 13 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 94/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 3 placeholder links

    • 3 of 133 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 28/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 43/100

    9% of the overall score

    18 external links, 0 citation phrases, 1 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 56/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (5)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 42/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    4 of 14 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 55/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references. Last modified: 8/20/2026

    • No recent year references in content
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 8/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    1 of 104 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 66/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 66/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1432 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited IT Infrastructure / Cloud sites

Other IT Infrastructure / Cloud sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.