Kuroma Kuroma

www.nccu.edu.tw scores 32/100 for AI Readiness

NCCU (www.nccu.edu.tw) is a Online Learning / Course Platform site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 32/100 (grade F), audited 16 Sep 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (49) and its weakest is Authority Signals (16); the biggest single gap is Unique Value Proposition at 0/100 (No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check). That places it below the median of the 208 Online Learning / Course Platform sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://www.nccu.edu.tw

32/100
Grade
F

The most points to recover are in Trust & Brand Signals: it scored 5/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 8.5 points off the overall score.

This audit is 44 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 44 days ago

Below the median in Online Learning / Course Platform Median 41 · Top quartile 46 · across 208 audited sites in Online Learning / Course Platform

Is www.nccu.edu.tw ready for AI search?

Not yet: www.nccu.edu.tw scores 32/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 47
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 49
Authority Signals 25% of the score 16
AI Readiness 30% of the score 22

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add Trust Signals up to +8.5 pts

    On https://www.nccu.edu.tw · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 5/100

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
    • Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6.8 pts

    On https://www.nccu.edu.tw · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 10/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +6.4 pts

    On https://www.nccu.edu.tw · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 51/100

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 14 of 75 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Add canonical tag to prevent duplicate content issues
    • This page opens 43 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6.3 pts

    On https://www.nccu.edu.tw · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 10/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.1 pts

    On https://www.nccu.edu.tw · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 6/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 81/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 472 words, 7 paragraphs, 10 lists, 1 tables, 33 images (30 with alt text)

    • Content length (472 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 3 images missing alt text (e.g. /images/clear.gif, /images/clear.gif, /images/clear.gif)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 6/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 25/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 75/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 3, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 39/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 3 of 33 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 15 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Picture description", "Picture description", "Picture description").
    • 22 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 33 images but only ~472 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Fail 20/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 69/100

    2% of the overall score

    6 render-blocking resources. 577 elements for 472 words

  • Mobile Optimization Needs work 42/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

    • Viewport not configured for device width
  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 51/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 14 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 14 of 75 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 10/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 33/100

    9% of the overall score

    4 external links, 0 citation phrases, 1 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 5/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Social profiles (1)

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 16/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    0 of 3 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 1 comparison structures

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 10/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 35 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 45/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 45/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    472 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited Online Learning / Course Platform sites

Other Online Learning / Course Platform sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.