Kuroma Kuroma

seasalt.ai scores 59/100 for AI Readiness

seasalt.ai scores 59/100 (grade A) on AI Readiness, audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (72) and its weakest is Authority Signals (47); the biggest single gap is E-E-A-T Signals at 24/100 (No author attribution found).

Audited URL: https://seasalt.ai

59/100
Grade
A

This audit is 36 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 36 days ago

Is seasalt.ai ready for AI search?

Largely yes: seasalt.ai scores 59/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals and Improve Unique Value Proposition.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 72
Technical Optimization 64
Authority Signals 47
AI Readiness 54

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Found: 2014 words, 58 paragraphs, 19 lists, 1 tables, 35 images (35 with alt text)

  • FAQ schema present. 4 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Partial 60/100

    9 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, Organization, MobileApplication, FAQPage, WebPage, BreadcrumbList, Service

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    Average 6 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 82/100

    H1: 1, H2: 7, H3: 34. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 52/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 25 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Seasalt.ai", "SeaChat", "SeaX").
    • 1 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization

  • 9 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • 2 render-blocking resources. 1522 elements for 2014 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 1 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • The response at seasalt.ai is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 24/100

    Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • 13 external links, 0 citation phrases, 12 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 58/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social Links

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 95/100

    3 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 1 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 40/100

    0 original data indicators, 4 percentages, 1 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 25/100

    6 of 187 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 63/100

    Score: 63/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    2014 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card