Kuroma Kuroma

seevio.ai scores 46/100 for AI Readiness

seevio.ai scores 46/100 (grade C) on AI Readiness, audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (73) and its weakest is Authority Signals (22); the biggest single gap is Citation-Worthiness at 0/100 (Limited use of specific statistics).

Audited URL: https://seevio.ai

46/100
Grade
C

This audit is 36 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 36 days ago

Is seevio.ai ready for AI search?

Partly: seevio.ai scores 46/100 (grade C). The two fixes that matter most are Increase Citation-Worthy Content and Add External Citations & References.

Category scores

This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.

On-Page Content 73
Technical Optimization 52
Authority Signals 22
AI Readiness 41

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content

  • Found: 2724 words, 34 paragraphs, 2 lists, 2 tables, 70 images (69 with alt text)

    • 1 images missing alt text (e.g. /icons/seedance2.png)
  • No FAQ structure. 16 question headings. 6 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 40/100

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    Average 8 words/sentence. 3 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 34. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 39/100

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 of 70 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 2 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("Logo", "Logo") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 1 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("seedance2-5").
    • 16 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • 7 render-blocking resources. 1788 elements for 2724 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 78/100

    Has viewport. 13 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 3 placeholder links

    • 3 of 21 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at seevio.ai is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 35/100

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 14/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 10/25. Has author

    • No publication or update dates found
  • 0 external links, 0 citation phrases, 1 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 25/100

    Present: SSL, Privacy Policy

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 83/100

    7 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 2 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 25/100

    3 of 172 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 3 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 63/100

    Score: 63/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    2724 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card