Kuroma
dext.com scores 67/100 for AI Readiness
Online Bookkeeping Software for Small Businesses (dext.com) is a Accounting / Tax site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 67/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (83) and its weakest is AI Readiness (56); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 20/100 (3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: FAQPage). That places it in the top quartile of the 107 FinTech sites Kuroma has audited.
Audited URL: https://dext.com
The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 55/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 4.1 points off the overall score.
This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Top 25% in FinTech Median 51 · Top quartile 56 · across 107 audited sites in FinTech
Is dext.com ready for AI search?
Largely yes: dext.com scores 67/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Unique Value Proposition.
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts
On https://dext.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4 pts
On https://dext.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 43/100
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Update Content Freshness up to +4 pts
On https://dext.com · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 30/100
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
- Update statistics and data to 2026
- Add article:modified_time meta tag
- Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4 pts
On https://dext.com · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 22/100
- Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
- Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
- Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
-
Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.6 pts
On https://dext.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 20/100
- Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 3246 words, 166 paragraphs, 13 lists, 83 images (10 with alt text)
- 73 images missing alt text
-
6.5% of the overall score
FAQ schema present. 1 question headings. 3 questions detected in content
-
4.5% of the overall score
3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: FAQPage
-
3% of the overall score
Average 8 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 6. Hierarchy issues.
- Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
-
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 8 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- 2 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
1% of the overall score
3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
2% of the overall score
24 render-blocking resources. 4766 elements for 3246 words
- 24 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
-
4% of the overall score
Has viewport. 60 responsive images
-
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed
- Canonical URL does not match page URL
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
7% of the overall score
Experience: 4/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 16/25. Trust: 10/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
9% of the overall score
55 external links, 0 citation phrases, 16 statistics. No references section.
-
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Publisher schema (5 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (5)
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
7.2% of the overall score
13 of 39 headings open a quotable passage, 4 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema
-
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 8 percentages, 0 quotes.
-
5.7% of the overall score
References current year
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
5.1% of the overall score
10 of 266 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
-
3% of the overall score
Score: 55/100
-
1.5% of the overall score
3246 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this cardOther audited Accounting / Tax sites
Other Accounting / Tax sites without a public score card
No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.