Kuroma
juliawang.net scores 29/100 for AI Readiness
juliawang.net scores 29/100 (grade F) on AI Readiness, audited 10 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (43) and its weakest is AI Readiness (20); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected).
Audited URL: https://Juliawang.net
This audit is 37 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.
Is juliawang.net ready for AI search?
Not yet: juliawang.net scores 29/100 (grade F). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.
Category scores
This audit was scored on rubric version 2026-08-10, not the current 2026-08-13 rubric. Scores are only comparable within one rubric generation, so how much each check counts toward the total is left out. The checks on this page, their verdicts and their scores are exactly what that audit measured. A fresh audit of this site is scored on the current rubric.
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content
-
Found: 294 words, 13 paragraphs, 13 images (13 with alt text)
- Content length (294 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
- Limited use of lists for scannable content
-
No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
No JSON-LD structured data found
- No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
-
Average 11 words/sentence. 2 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
H1: 1, H2: 4, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.
-
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 9 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Meta", "BillionToOne", "BillionToOne").
- 4 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- This page has 13 images but only ~294 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
Technical Optimization
-
0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph
-
2 render-blocking resources. 178 elements for 294 words
-
Has viewport. 4 responsive images
-
HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. No robots.txt, so nothing blocks AI crawlers. 4 placeholder links
- Missing canonical tag
- 4 of 11 links cannot be followed by a crawler
Authority Signals
-
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 0/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
1 external links, 0 citation phrases, 1 statistics. No references section.
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
-
Present: SSL, Social Links
- No privacy policy link found
- No contact information easily accessible
AI Readiness
-
0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures
- No FAQ structure detected
-
0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
References current year
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
1 of 15 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
-
Score: 63/100
-
294 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
Score your own site → Claim this card