Kuroma Kuroma

www.teamgroupinc.com scores 41/100 for AI Readiness

www.teamgroupinc.com is a IT Infrastructure / Cloud site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 41/100 (grade D), audited 15 Oct 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (51) and its weakest is AI Readiness (20); the biggest single gap is Citation-Worthiness at 0/100 (Limited use of specific statistics). That places it above the median of the 373 IT Infrastructure / Cloud sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://www.teamgroupinc.com

41/100
Grade
D

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 40/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 7.8 points off the overall score.

This audit is 15 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 15 days ago

Above the median in IT Infrastructure / Cloud Median 40 · Top quartile 46 · across 373 audited sites in IT Infrastructure / Cloud

Is www.teamgroupinc.com ready for AI search?

Not yet: www.teamgroupinc.com scores 41/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Increase Citation-Worthy Content.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 51
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 46
Authority Signals 25% of the score 51
AI Readiness 30% of the score 20

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7.8 pts

    On https://www.teamgroupinc.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 40/100

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 67 of 299 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.teamgroupinc.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Add canonical tag to prevent duplicate content issues
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at www.teamgroupinc.com — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://www.teamgroupinc.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +6.3 pts

    On https://www.teamgroupinc.com · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 13/100

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
    • Add a section heading followed by 25 to 200 words that answer it on their own, so an assistant can lift the answer without the rest of the page
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
  4. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +5.9 pts

    On https://www.teamgroupinc.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 9/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  5. Add Trust Signals up to +4.7 pts

    On https://www.teamgroupinc.com · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 48/100

    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 84/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1,531 words, 18 paragraphs, 31 lists, 38 images (21 with alt text)

    • 17 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 9/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 36/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: BreadcrumbList

  • AI Readability Score Pass 79/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 12 words/sentence. 4 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 75/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 5, H3: 11. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 36/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 17 of 38 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 12 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("TEAMGROUP", "GAMER", "CREATOR").
    • 16 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 38 images but only ~1,531 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Partial 60/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 51/100

    2% of the overall score

    30 render-blocking resources. 1,618 elements for 1,531 words

    • 30 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 40/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 67 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 67 of 299 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.teamgroupinc.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 42/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 20/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 60/100

    9% of the overall score

    9 external links, 2 citation phrases, 0 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 48/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (6)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 13/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    0 of 16 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 10/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 55 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 3 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 43/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 43/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1,531 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

Other audited IT Infrastructure / Cloud sites

Other IT Infrastructure / Cloud sites without a public score card

No public score card exists for these sites yet. Pick one to run a free audit on it; nothing runs until you confirm on the next page.