Kuroma Kuroma

futuremadestudio.com scores 35/100 for AI Readiness

Futuremade Studio (FTMD.) (futuremadestudio.com) scores 35/100 (grade D) on AI Readiness, audited 16 Oct 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (61) and its weakest is Authority Signals (20); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it below the median of the 31,080 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://futuremadestudio.com

35/100
Grade
D

The most points to recover are in External Citations & References: it scored 15/100 on a check worth 9% of the total, which takes 7.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 13 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 13 days ago

Below the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 31,080 audited sites

Is futuremadestudio.com ready for AI search?

Not yet: futuremadestudio.com scores 35/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 45
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 61
Authority Signals 25% of the score 20
AI Readiness 30% of the score 23

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add External Citations & References up to +7.7 pts

    On https://futuremadestudio.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 15/100

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
    • Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://futuremadestudio.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://futuremadestudio.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6.3 pts

    On https://futuremadestudio.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 10/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +6.1 pts

    On https://futuremadestudio.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 53/100

    • 6 of 74 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at futuremadestudio.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • This page opens 46 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at futuremadestudio.com — the response we received could not be parsed as one

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 72/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 731 words, 54 paragraphs, 16 lists, 118 images (65 with alt text)

    • Content length (731 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 53 images missing alt text (e.g. //futuremadestudio.com/cdn/shop/files/DSC02666_1.jpg?v=1791455204&width=3000, //futuremadestudio.com/cdn/shop/files/DSCC000_62_5711c372-8c4d-4772-933a-9f6ad1b0d417.jpg?v=1791453909&width=3000, //futuremades…
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 29/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Product

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 4 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 75/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 6, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 33/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 53 of 118 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 115 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 118 images but only ~731 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
    • 1 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Partial 60/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 49/100

    2% of the overall score

    11 render-blocking resources. 1,780 elements for 731 words

    • 11 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 93/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 117 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 53/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 6 placeholder links

    • 6 of 74 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at futuremadestudio.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 10/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 7/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Fail 15/100

    9% of the overall score

    1 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 33/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Contact, Social profiles (1)

    • No privacy policy link found

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 39/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    3 of 6 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 5/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 55 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 2 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 81/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 81/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    731 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card