Kuroma Kuroma

www.studioocra.com scores 37/100 for AI Readiness

BESPOKE INTERIOR DESIGNER & RENOVATIONS IN NEW YORK (www.studioocra.com) scores 37/100 (grade D) on AI Readiness, audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (54) and its weakest is AI Readiness (24); the biggest single gap is Question Coverage & FAQ Presence at 0/100 (No FAQ schema markup detected). That places it below the median of the 30,898 sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://www.studioocra.com

37/100
Grade
D

The most points to recover are in Crawlability & Accessibility: it scored 41/100 on a check worth 13% of the total, which takes 7.7 points off the overall score.

This audit is 25 days old. AI answers change between audits, so what AI search sees today may differ from this card.

Updated 25 days ago

Below the median of all audited sites Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 30,898 audited sites

Is www.studioocra.com ready for AI search?

Not yet: www.studioocra.com scores 37/100 (grade D). Start with Add FAQ Schema Markup and Make This Page’s Facts Extractable.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 37
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 54
Authority Signals 25% of the score 40
AI Readiness 30% of the score 24

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +7.7 pts

    On https://www.studioocra.com · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 41/100

    • 9 of 59 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.studioocra.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • This page opens 20 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at www.studioocra.com — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://www.studioocra.com · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://www.studioocra.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://www.studioocra.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.7 pts

    On https://www.studioocra.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 18/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 70/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 204 words, 30 paragraphs, 4 lists, 49 images (49 with alt text)

    • Content length (204 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: HomeAndConstructionBusiness, WebSite

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 4 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 65/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 1, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.

    • Insufficient section headings to break the content up
  • Media Accessibility Partial 50/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 5 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("Studio Ocra-Sutton Place apt kitchen (1).webp", "Studio-Ocra-Brooklyn-LIVING-MILLWORK-Screen.webp", "Studio-Ocra-Sutton-Place-Residence-dining-pendant-contemporary-design (1).webp") that te…
    • 3 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Instagram", "Pinterest", "Facebook").
    • 45 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 49 images but only ~204 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 62/100

    2% of the overall score

    4 render-blocking resources. 1109 elements for 204 words

    • The page spends 1109 HTML elements on 204 words of content, so crawlers parse far more markup than answer
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 46 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 41/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 9 placeholder links

    • 9 of 59 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at www.studioocra.com is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 18/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 4/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    5 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 61/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (1 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (3)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 52/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    1 of 2 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 24 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 76/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 76/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 79/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    204 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card